style: apply prettier formatting

src/db/paired-state.ts

@@ -619,13 +619,7 @@ export function refreshPairedTaskExecutionLeaseInDatabase(
            AND expires_at >= ?
       `,
     )
-    .run(
-      now,
-      computeExecutionLeaseExpiry(now),
-      args.taskId,
-      args.runId,
-      now,
-    );
+    .run(now, computeExecutionLeaseExpiry(now), args.taskId, args.runId, now);
   return result.changes > 0;
 }
 

src/message-agent-executor.test.ts

@@ -57,12 +57,7 @@ vi.mock('./db.js', () => {
     taskUpdatedAt: string;
     intentKind: string;
   }) =>
-    [
-      args.chatJid,
-      args.taskId,
-      args.taskUpdatedAt,
-      args.intentKind,
-    ].join(':');
+    [args.chatJid, args.taskId, args.taskUpdatedAt, args.intentKind].join(':');
 
   return {
     createServiceHandoff: vi.fn(),

src/message-runtime-follow-up.ts

@@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ export function resolvePairedFollowUpDecision(args: {
 export function schedulePairedFollowUpIntent(args: {
   chatJid: string;
   runId: string;
-  task: Pick<
-    PairedTask,
-    'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'
-  > | null | undefined;
+  task:
+    | Pick<PairedTask, 'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'>
+    | null
+    | undefined;
   intentKind: ScheduledPairedFollowUpIntentKind;
   enqueue: () => void;
   fallbackLastTurnOutputRole?: PairedRoomRole | null;
@@ -126,10 +126,10 @@ export function schedulePairedFollowUpIntent(args: {
 export function schedulePairedFollowUpWithMessageCheck(args: {
   chatJid: string;
   runId: string;
-  task: Pick<
-    PairedTask,
-    'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'
-  > | null | undefined;
+  task:
+    | Pick<PairedTask, 'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'>
+    | null
+    | undefined;
   intentKind: ScheduledPairedFollowUpIntentKind;
   enqueueMessageCheck: () => void;
   fallbackLastTurnOutputRole?: PairedRoomRole | null;
@@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ export function schedulePairedFollowUpWithMessageCheck(args: {
 export function dispatchPairedFollowUpForEvent(args: {
   chatJid: string;
   runId: string;
-  task: Pick<
-    PairedTask,
-    'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'
-  > | null | undefined;
+  task:
+    | Pick<PairedTask, 'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'>
+    | null
+    | undefined;
   source: PairedFollowUpSource;
   completedRole?: PairedRoomRole;
   executionStatus?: 'succeeded' | 'failed';
@@ -212,10 +212,10 @@ export function dispatchPairedFollowUpForEvent(args: {
 export function enqueuePairedFollowUpAfterEvent(args: {
   chatJid: string;
   runId: string;
-  task: Pick<
-    PairedTask,
-    'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'
-  > | null | undefined;
+  task:
+    | Pick<PairedTask, 'id' | 'status' | 'round_trip_count' | 'updated_at'>
+    | null
+    | undefined;
   source: PairedFollowUpSource;
   completedRole?: PairedRoomRole;
   executionStatus?: 'succeeded' | 'failed';

src/message-runtime-rules.ts

@@ -82,7 +82,10 @@ export type NextTurnAction =
   | { kind: 'owner-follow-up' }
   | { kind: 'finalize-owner-turn' };
 
-export type ScheduledNextTurnActionKind = Exclude<NextTurnAction['kind'], 'none'>;
+export type ScheduledNextTurnActionKind = Exclude<
+  NextTurnAction['kind'],
+  'none'
+>;
 
 export type FollowUpDispatch =
   | { kind: 'none' }

src/message-runtime.test.ts

@@ -73,12 +73,7 @@ vi.mock('./db.js', () => {
     taskUpdatedAt: string;
     intentKind: string;
   }) =>
-    [
-      args.chatJid,
-      args.taskId,
-      args.taskUpdatedAt,
-      args.intentKind,
-    ].join(':');
+    [args.chatJid, args.taskId, args.taskUpdatedAt, args.intentKind].join(':');
 
   return {
     claimServiceHandoff: vi.fn(() => true),
@@ -2012,21 +2007,22 @@ If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead
     vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockImplementation(
       () => pairedTask,
     );
-    vi.mocked(db.getMessagesSince).mockImplementation((_chatJid, sinceCursor) =>
-      sinceCursor && sinceCursor !== '0'
-        ? []
-        : ([
-            {
-              id: 'human-dedup-1',
-              chat_jid: chatJid,
-              sender: 'user@test',
-              sender_name: 'User',
-              content: '이 구현 진행해줘',
-              timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
-              seq: 1,
-              is_bot_message: false,
-            },
-          ] as any),
+    vi.mocked(db.getMessagesSince).mockImplementation(
+      (_chatJid, sinceCursor) =>
+        sinceCursor && sinceCursor !== '0'
+          ? []
+          : ([
+              {
+                id: 'human-dedup-1',
+                chat_jid: chatJid,
+                sender: 'user@test',
+                sender_name: 'User',
+                content: '이 구현 진행해줘',
+                timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
+                seq: 1,
+                is_bot_message: false,
+              },
+            ] as any),
     );
     vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
       async (_group, _input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
@@ -2513,21 +2509,22 @@ If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead
     vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockImplementation(
       () => pairedTask,
     );
-    vi.mocked(db.getMessagesSince).mockImplementation((_chatJid, sinceCursor) =>
-      sinceCursor && sinceCursor !== '0'
-        ? []
-        : ([
-            {
-              id: 'human-dedup-across-runs-1',
-              chat_jid: chatJid,
-              sender: 'user@test',
-              sender_name: 'User',
-              content: '이 구현 진행해줘',
-              timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
-              seq: 1,
-              is_bot_message: false,
-            },
-          ] as any),
+    vi.mocked(db.getMessagesSince).mockImplementation(
+      (_chatJid, sinceCursor) =>
+        sinceCursor && sinceCursor !== '0'
+          ? []
+          : ([
+              {
+                id: 'human-dedup-across-runs-1',
+                chat_jid: chatJid,
+                sender: 'user@test',
+                sender_name: 'User',
+                content: '이 구현 진행해줘',
+                timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
+                seq: 1,
+                is_bot_message: false,
+              },
+            ] as any),
     );
     vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
       async (_group, _input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {

src/paired-follow-up-scheduler.test.ts

@@ -195,9 +195,7 @@ describe('paired follow-up scheduler', () => {
       intentKind: 'reviewer-turn',
     });
 
-    expect(first).toMatch(
-      /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}Z$/,
-    );
+    expect(first).toMatch(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}Z$/);
     expect(second).toBeNull();
     expect(getPairedTaskById(task.id)?.updated_at).toBe(first);
   });
@@ -238,9 +236,7 @@ describe('paired follow-up scheduler', () => {
         task,
         intentKind: 'reviewer-turn',
       });
-      expect(first).toMatch(
-        /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}Z$/,
-      );
+      expect(first).toMatch(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}Z$/);
 
       _initTestDatabaseFromFile(dbPath);
       const freshTask = getPairedTaskById(task.id);
@@ -272,11 +268,7 @@ describe('paired follow-up scheduler', () => {
              WHERE task_id = ?
           `,
         )
-        .run(
-          '2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
-          '2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
-          task.id,
-        );
+        .run('2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z', '2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z', task.id);
       rawDatabase.close();
 
       _initTestDatabaseFromFile(dbPath);