backup current stable ejclaw state
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,3 +5,95 @@ This file is for mutable memory shared across Claude groups.
|
||||
Use it for durable facts, preferences, and shared context that may change over time.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not store platform-wide operating rules here. Those now live in `prompts/claude-platform.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stored credentials
|
||||
|
||||
Shared credentials live at `/home/claude/.config/ejclaw/secrets.json` (chmod 600, owner-only). Read with the Read tool when a session in any channel asks to "저장해둔 계정토큰으로 로그인" or otherwise needs a registered token.
|
||||
|
||||
Schema: `credentials.<host>.{type, host, token, note, added_at}`.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently stored:
|
||||
- `git.tkrmagid.kr` — Gitea personal access token. Use via `Authorization: token <value>` header, or embed in HTTPS URL as `https://<user>:<token>@git.tkrmagid.kr/...`. For `git clone/push`, prefer the URL form or `git -c http.extraHeader="Authorization: token <value>" clone ...`. Do not paste the raw token into chat replies.
|
||||
- `sudo` — local sudo password for the `claude` user on this host. Use via `echo "$PW" | sudo -S <cmd>` (read the password from `credentials.sudo.password` with the Read tool, then pipe). Do not paste the raw password into chat replies.
|
||||
|
||||
To add or rotate a credential, edit `secrets.json` and append a new entry under `credentials`; update this list with the host and intended use.
|
||||
|
||||
## Room mode policy
|
||||
|
||||
All rooms default to `tribunal` (paired) mode. Owner runs the work, reviewer/arbiter (claude-code) verifies. New rooms registered via `bun setup/index.ts --step register` are also `tribunal` by default.
|
||||
|
||||
If the user in a channel says any of these — "클로드 사용하지 말자", "paired 모드 끄자", "리뷰어 끄자", "이 방은 single 로 바꿔줘" — switch that channel back to `single` mode. Use:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bun -e "import { initDatabase, setExplicitRoomMode } from './src/db.js'; initDatabase(); setExplicitRoomMode('<chatJid>', 'single');"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The reverse phrase ("paired 켜자", "리뷰어 다시 켜자") flips it back to `'tribunal'`. Acknowledge the change in chat and confirm the new mode.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Think Before Coding
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
|
||||
|
||||
Before implementing:
|
||||
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
|
||||
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
|
||||
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
|
||||
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Simplicity First
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
|
||||
|
||||
- No features beyond what was asked.
|
||||
- No abstractions for single-use code.
|
||||
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
|
||||
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
|
||||
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
|
||||
|
||||
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Surgical Changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
|
||||
|
||||
When editing existing code:
|
||||
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
|
||||
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
|
||||
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
|
||||
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your changes create orphans:
|
||||
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
|
||||
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
|
||||
|
||||
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
|
||||
|
||||
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
|
||||
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
|
||||
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
|
||||
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
|
||||
|
||||
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user