fix: support same-service tribunal runtime
This commit is contained in:
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ describe('paired room registration', () => {
|
||||
expect(isPairedRoomJid('dc:explicit-single')).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('keeps explicit tribunal configured but not runnable without dual registration', () => {
|
||||
it('lets explicit tribunal become runnable when the configured reviewer can run on the solo registration', () => {
|
||||
setRegisteredGroup('dc:explicit-tribunal', {
|
||||
name: 'Explicit Tribunal Claude',
|
||||
folder: 'explicit-tribunal-claude',
|
||||
@@ -868,8 +868,8 @@ describe('paired room registration', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(getExplicitRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe('tribunal');
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe('tribunal');
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRuntimeRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe('single');
|
||||
expect(isPairedRoomJid('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRuntimeRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe('tribunal');
|
||||
expect(isPairedRoomJid('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
clearExplicitRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal');
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -878,6 +878,24 @@ describe('paired room registration', () => {
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRuntimeRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe('single');
|
||||
expect(isPairedRoomJid('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('keeps explicit tribunal non-runnable when the configured reviewer service is unavailable', () => {
|
||||
setRegisteredGroup('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex', {
|
||||
name: 'Explicit Tribunal Codex',
|
||||
folder: 'explicit-tribunal-codex',
|
||||
trigger: '@Codex',
|
||||
added_at: '2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
agentType: 'codex',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
setExplicitRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex', 'tribunal');
|
||||
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex')).toBe('tribunal');
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveRuntimeRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex')).toBe(
|
||||
'single',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(isPairedRoomJid('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex')).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('service handoff completion', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
13
src/db.ts
13
src/db.ts
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import {
|
||||
CODEX_REVIEW_SERVICE_ID,
|
||||
DATA_DIR,
|
||||
normalizeServiceId,
|
||||
REVIEWER_AGENT_TYPE,
|
||||
SERVICE_ID,
|
||||
SERVICE_SESSION_SCOPE,
|
||||
STORE_DIR,
|
||||
@@ -1978,9 +1979,19 @@ export function getEffectiveRoomMode(chatJid: string): RoomMode {
|
||||
return getExplicitRoomMode(chatJid) ?? inferRoomModeForJid(chatJid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function canRunTribunalFromRegisteredAgentTypes(
|
||||
agentTypes: readonly AgentType[],
|
||||
): boolean {
|
||||
const types = new Set(agentTypes);
|
||||
if (types.size === 0) return false;
|
||||
return REVIEWER_AGENT_TYPE === 'claude-code'
|
||||
? types.has('claude-code')
|
||||
: types.has('codex');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function getEffectiveRuntimeRoomMode(chatJid: string): RoomMode {
|
||||
return getEffectiveRoomMode(chatJid) === 'tribunal' &&
|
||||
inferRoomModeForJid(chatJid) === 'tribunal'
|
||||
canRunTribunalFromRegisteredAgentTypes(getRegisteredAgentTypesForJid(chatJid))
|
||||
? 'tribunal'
|
||||
: 'single';
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -338,6 +338,60 @@ describe('runAgentForGroup room memory', () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('preserves reviewer role metadata for same-service review turns', async () => {
|
||||
const group = { ...makeGroup(), folder: 'test-group' };
|
||||
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.getEffectiveChannelLease).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
arbiter_service_id: null,
|
||||
activated_at: null,
|
||||
reason: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
id: 'paired-task-review',
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
group_folder: 'test-group',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
round_trip_count: 0,
|
||||
review_requested_at: '2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
status: 'review_ready',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await runAgentForGroup(makeDeps(), {
|
||||
group,
|
||||
prompt: 'hello',
|
||||
chatJid: 'group@test',
|
||||
runId: 'run-same-service-reviewer',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
group,
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
roomRoleContext: {
|
||||
serviceId: 'claude',
|
||||
role: 'reviewer',
|
||||
ownerServiceId: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewerServiceId: 'claude',
|
||||
failoverOwner: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expect.any(Function),
|
||||
undefined,
|
||||
undefined,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('allows silent reviewer outputs', async () => {
|
||||
const group = { ...makeGroup(), folder: 'test-group', workDir: '/repo' };
|
||||
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.getEffectiveChannelLease).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ export async function runAgentForGroup(
|
||||
const roomRoleContext = buildRoomRoleContext(
|
||||
currentLease,
|
||||
effectiveServiceId,
|
||||
activeRole,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const pairedExecutionContext = preparePairedExecutionContext({
|
||||
group,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ import * as db from './db.js';
|
||||
import { resolveGroupIpcPath } from './group-folder.js';
|
||||
import { createMessageRuntime } from './message-runtime.js';
|
||||
import * as config from './config.js';
|
||||
import * as serviceRouting from './service-routing.js';
|
||||
import type { Channel, RegisteredGroup } from './types.js';
|
||||
|
||||
function makeGroup(agentType: 'claude-code' | 'codex'): RegisteredGroup {
|
||||
@@ -869,6 +870,228 @@ describe('createMessageRuntime', () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not fabricate owner labels from same-service raw bot history in paired turn prompts', async () => {
|
||||
const chatJid = 'group@test';
|
||||
const group = makeGroup('claude-code');
|
||||
const saveState = vi.fn();
|
||||
const lastAgentTimestamps: Record<string, string> = {};
|
||||
const channel: Channel = {
|
||||
...makeChannel(chatJid),
|
||||
isOwnMessage: vi.fn((msg) => msg.sender === 'shared-bot@test'),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.isPairedRoomJid).mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.getEffectiveChannelLease).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
arbiter_service_id: null,
|
||||
activated_at: null,
|
||||
reason: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
id: 'task-same-service',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
group_folder: group.folder,
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
review_requested_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
round_trip_count: 1,
|
||||
status: 'in_review',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTurnOutputs).mockReturnValue([]);
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getMessagesSince).mockReturnValue([
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: 'human-1',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
sender: 'user@test',
|
||||
sender_name: 'User',
|
||||
content: '계속 진행해줘',
|
||||
timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:01.000Z',
|
||||
is_bot_message: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: 'bot-1',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
sender: 'shared-bot@test',
|
||||
sender_name: 'Shared Bot',
|
||||
content: 'reviewer-like reply',
|
||||
timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:02.000Z',
|
||||
is_bot_message: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
] as any);
|
||||
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
|
||||
async (_group, input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
|
||||
expect(input.prompt).toContain(
|
||||
'<message sender="Shared Bot" time="30 Mar 09:00">reviewer-like reply</message>',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain(
|
||||
'<message sender="owner" time="30 Mar 09:00">reviewer-like reply</message>',
|
||||
);
|
||||
await onOutput?.({
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
phase: 'final',
|
||||
result: '같은 서비스 턴 확인',
|
||||
newSessionId: 'session-same-service-fallback',
|
||||
});
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: '같은 서비스 턴 확인',
|
||||
newSessionId: 'session-same-service-fallback',
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const runtime = createMessageRuntime({
|
||||
assistantName: 'Andy',
|
||||
idleTimeout: 1_000,
|
||||
pollInterval: 1_000,
|
||||
timezone: 'Asia/Seoul',
|
||||
triggerPattern: /^@Andy\b/i,
|
||||
channels: [channel],
|
||||
queue: {
|
||||
registerProcess: vi.fn(),
|
||||
closeStdin: vi.fn(),
|
||||
notifyIdle: vi.fn(),
|
||||
} as any,
|
||||
getRegisteredGroups: () => ({ [chatJid]: group }),
|
||||
getSessions: () => ({}),
|
||||
getLastTimestamp: () => '',
|
||||
setLastTimestamp: vi.fn(),
|
||||
getLastAgentTimestamps: () => lastAgentTimestamps,
|
||||
saveState,
|
||||
persistSession: vi.fn(),
|
||||
clearSession: vi.fn(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await runtime.processGroupMessages(chatJid, {
|
||||
runId: 'run-same-service-raw-history',
|
||||
reason: 'messages',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not fabricate owner labels from same-service raw bot history in arbiter prompts', async () => {
|
||||
const chatJid = 'group@test';
|
||||
const group = makeGroup('claude-code');
|
||||
const channel: Channel = {
|
||||
...makeChannel(chatJid),
|
||||
isOwnMessage: vi.fn((msg) => msg.sender === 'shared-bot@test'),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.isPairedRoomJid).mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.getEffectiveChannelLease).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
arbiter_service_id: null,
|
||||
activated_at: null,
|
||||
reason: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
id: 'task-same-service-arbiter',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
group_folder: group.folder,
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
review_requested_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
round_trip_count: 2,
|
||||
status: 'arbiter_requested',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:10.000Z',
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-30T00:00:10.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTurnOutputs).mockReturnValue([]);
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getRecentChatMessages).mockReturnValue([
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: 'human-1',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
sender: 'user@test',
|
||||
sender_name: 'User',
|
||||
content: '둘 중 누가 맞는지 판단해줘',
|
||||
timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:01.000Z',
|
||||
is_bot_message: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: 'bot-1',
|
||||
chat_jid: chatJid,
|
||||
sender: 'shared-bot@test',
|
||||
sender_name: 'Shared Bot',
|
||||
content: 'reviewer-like reply',
|
||||
timestamp: '2026-03-30T00:00:02.000Z',
|
||||
is_bot_message: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
] as any);
|
||||
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
|
||||
async (_group, input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
|
||||
expect(input.prompt).toContain(
|
||||
'<message sender="Shared Bot" time="30 Mar 09:00">reviewer-like reply</message>',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain(
|
||||
'<message sender="owner" time="30 Mar 09:00">reviewer-like reply</message>',
|
||||
);
|
||||
await onOutput?.({
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
phase: 'final',
|
||||
result: '중재 문맥 확인',
|
||||
newSessionId: 'session-same-service-arbiter',
|
||||
});
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: '중재 문맥 확인',
|
||||
newSessionId: 'session-same-service-arbiter',
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const runtime = createMessageRuntime({
|
||||
assistantName: 'Andy',
|
||||
idleTimeout: 1_000,
|
||||
pollInterval: 1_000,
|
||||
timezone: 'Asia/Seoul',
|
||||
triggerPattern: /^@Andy\b/i,
|
||||
channels: [channel],
|
||||
queue: {
|
||||
registerProcess: vi.fn(),
|
||||
closeStdin: vi.fn(),
|
||||
notifyIdle: vi.fn(),
|
||||
} as any,
|
||||
getRegisteredGroups: () => ({ [chatJid]: group }),
|
||||
getSessions: () => ({}),
|
||||
getLastTimestamp: () => '',
|
||||
setLastTimestamp: vi.fn(),
|
||||
getLastAgentTimestamps: () => ({}),
|
||||
saveState: vi.fn(),
|
||||
persistSession: vi.fn(),
|
||||
clearSession: vi.fn(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await runtime.processGroupMessages(chatJid, {
|
||||
runId: 'run-same-service-arbiter-fallback',
|
||||
reason: 'messages',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('allows follow-up messages without a trigger after a visible reply in non-main groups', async () => {
|
||||
const chatJid = 'group@test';
|
||||
const group: RegisteredGroup = {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ export function createMessageRuntime(deps: MessageRuntimeDeps): {
|
||||
): NewMessage[] => {
|
||||
if (!isPairedRoomJid(chatJid)) return messages;
|
||||
const lease = getEffectiveChannelLease(chatJid);
|
||||
const sharedOwnerReviewerService =
|
||||
lease.reviewer_service_id !== null &&
|
||||
lease.owner_service_id === lease.reviewer_service_id;
|
||||
// Build bot-user-id → channel-name mapping from connected channels
|
||||
const botIdToChannelName = new Map<string, string>();
|
||||
for (const ch of deps.channels) {
|
||||
@@ -155,6 +158,15 @@ export function createMessageRuntime(deps: MessageRuntimeDeps): {
|
||||
if (!channelName) return msg;
|
||||
const serviceId = channelToService[channelName];
|
||||
if (!serviceId) return msg;
|
||||
// Raw channel history cannot tell owner/reviewer apart when both roles
|
||||
// are delivered by the same service, so avoid fabricating a role label.
|
||||
if (
|
||||
sharedOwnerReviewerService &&
|
||||
serviceId === lease.owner_service_id &&
|
||||
serviceId === lease.reviewer_service_id
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return msg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
const role =
|
||||
serviceId === lease.owner_service_id
|
||||
? 'owner'
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -75,6 +75,31 @@ describe('buildRoomRoleContext', () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('uses the preferred reviewer role when owner and reviewer share the same service', () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
buildRoomRoleContext(
|
||||
{
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
arbiter_service_id: null,
|
||||
activated_at: null,
|
||||
reason: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'claude',
|
||||
'reviewer',
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual({
|
||||
serviceId: 'claude',
|
||||
role: 'reviewer',
|
||||
ownerServiceId: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewerServiceId: 'claude',
|
||||
failoverOwner: false,
|
||||
arbiterServiceId: undefined,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('returns undefined for a non-paired room', () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
buildRoomRoleContext(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ import {
|
||||
CODEX_REVIEW_SERVICE_ID,
|
||||
normalizeServiceId,
|
||||
} from './config.js';
|
||||
import type { RoomRoleContext } from './types.js';
|
||||
import type { PairedRoomRole, RoomRoleContext } from './types.js';
|
||||
import type { EffectiveChannelLease } from './service-routing.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export function buildRoomRoleContext(
|
||||
lease: EffectiveChannelLease,
|
||||
serviceId: string,
|
||||
preferredRole?: PairedRoomRole,
|
||||
): RoomRoleContext | undefined {
|
||||
const normalizedServiceId = normalizeServiceId(serviceId);
|
||||
const reviewerServiceId = lease.reviewer_service_id
|
||||
@@ -24,14 +25,20 @@ export function buildRoomRoleContext(
|
||||
? normalizeServiceId(lease.arbiter_service_id)
|
||||
: undefined;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check arbiter role first: if this service matches the arbiter_service_id,
|
||||
// it takes the arbiter role (even if it also matches owner or reviewer)
|
||||
const matches = {
|
||||
owner: ownerServiceId === normalizedServiceId,
|
||||
reviewer: reviewerServiceId === normalizedServiceId,
|
||||
arbiter: arbiterServiceId === normalizedServiceId,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const role =
|
||||
arbiterServiceId && arbiterServiceId === normalizedServiceId
|
||||
preferredRole && matches[preferredRole]
|
||||
? preferredRole
|
||||
: matches.arbiter
|
||||
? 'arbiter'
|
||||
: ownerServiceId === normalizedServiceId
|
||||
: matches.owner
|
||||
? 'owner'
|
||||
: reviewerServiceId === normalizedServiceId
|
||||
: matches.reviewer
|
||||
? 'reviewer'
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ describe('service-routing global failover', () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not create reviewer lease for explicit tribunal without dual registration capability', () => {
|
||||
it('creates a same-service reviewer lease when explicit tribunal is runnable on a solo registration', () => {
|
||||
setRegisteredGroup('dc:explicit-tribunal', {
|
||||
name: 'Explicit Tribunal Claude',
|
||||
folder: 'explicit-tribunal-claude',
|
||||
@@ -121,6 +121,24 @@ describe('service-routing global failover', () => {
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveChannelLease('dc:explicit-tribunal')).toMatchObject({
|
||||
chat_jid: 'dc:explicit-tribunal',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('keeps reviewer lease disabled when explicit tribunal cannot deliver the configured reviewer', () => {
|
||||
setRegisteredGroup('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex', {
|
||||
name: 'Explicit Tribunal Codex',
|
||||
folder: 'explicit-tribunal-codex',
|
||||
trigger: '@Codex',
|
||||
added_at: '2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
agentType: 'codex',
|
||||
});
|
||||
setExplicitRoomMode('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex', 'tribunal');
|
||||
|
||||
expect(getEffectiveChannelLease('dc:explicit-tribunal-codex')).toMatchObject({
|
||||
chat_jid: 'dc:explicit-tribunal-codex',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'codex-main',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user