fix(paired): cap consecutive reviewer silent-failure retries
The reviewer (codex) sometimes emits a final result with no visible text. The runtime marks the run failed → handleFailedReviewerExecution preserves status as review_ready → the follow-up scheduler re-queues another reviewer-turn → loop. The existing round_trip / arbiter caps never fire because round_trip_count only advances on owner-side submissions; bot-side reviewer flakes never increment it. Mirror the owner_failure_count pattern: add reviewer_failure_count to paired_tasks, increment on each silent failure, and escalate via requestArbiterOrEscalate once it reaches 2. Reset to 0 on every successful reviewer completion path (PROCEED/REVISE/arbiter/wait-for-user) and when the owner re-submits a fresh review cycle. Repro chat: 1507762222724546560 (stock-adiviser). Task 33968d31-0da2-480c-85d3-7a3999822ab4 logged 11 consecutive reviewer-turn entries with no work_items and round_trip_count stuck at 1.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ export function applyBaseSchema(database: Database): void {
|
||||
review_requested_at TEXT,
|
||||
round_trip_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
owner_failure_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
reviewer_failure_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
owner_step_done_streak INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
finalize_step_done_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
task_done_then_user_reopen_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ function getExpectedSchemaMigrations(): Array<{
|
||||
{ version: 12, name: 'paired_verdict_and_step_telemetry' },
|
||||
{ version: 13, name: 'message_source_kind' },
|
||||
{ version: 14, name: 'work_item_attachments' },
|
||||
{ version: 15, name: 'reviewer_failure_count' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
23
src/db/migrations/015_reviewer-failure-count.ts
Normal file
23
src/db/migrations/015_reviewer-failure-count.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
import type { Database } from 'bun:sqlite';
|
||||
|
||||
import { tableHasColumn } from './helpers.js';
|
||||
import type { SchemaMigrationDefinition } from './types.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const REVIEWER_FAILURE_COUNT_MIGRATION: SchemaMigrationDefinition = {
|
||||
version: 15,
|
||||
name: 'reviewer_failure_count',
|
||||
apply(database: Database) {
|
||||
if (!tableHasColumn(database, 'paired_tasks', 'reviewer_failure_count')) {
|
||||
database.exec(`
|
||||
ALTER TABLE paired_tasks
|
||||
ADD COLUMN reviewer_failure_count INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0
|
||||
`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
database.exec(`
|
||||
UPDATE paired_tasks
|
||||
SET reviewer_failure_count = 0
|
||||
WHERE reviewer_failure_count IS NULL
|
||||
`);
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ import { OWNER_FAILURE_COUNT_MIGRATION } from './011_owner-failure-count.js';
|
||||
import { PAIRED_VERDICT_AND_STEP_TELEMETRY_MIGRATION } from './012_paired-verdict-and-step-telemetry.js';
|
||||
import { MESSAGE_SOURCE_KIND_MIGRATION } from './013_message-source-kind.js';
|
||||
import { WORK_ITEM_ATTACHMENTS_MIGRATION } from './014_work-item-attachments.js';
|
||||
import { REVIEWER_FAILURE_COUNT_MIGRATION } from './015_reviewer-failure-count.js';
|
||||
import type {
|
||||
SchemaMigrationArgs,
|
||||
SchemaMigrationDefinition,
|
||||
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ const ORDERED_SCHEMA_MIGRATIONS: readonly SchemaMigrationDefinition[] = [
|
||||
PAIRED_VERDICT_AND_STEP_TELEMETRY_MIGRATION,
|
||||
MESSAGE_SOURCE_KIND_MIGRATION,
|
||||
WORK_ITEM_ATTACHMENTS_MIGRATION,
|
||||
REVIEWER_FAILURE_COUNT_MIGRATION,
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
function ensureSchemaMigrationsTable(database: Database): void {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ export type PairedTaskUpdates = Partial<
|
||||
| 'review_requested_at'
|
||||
| 'round_trip_count'
|
||||
| 'owner_failure_count'
|
||||
| 'reviewer_failure_count'
|
||||
| 'owner_step_done_streak'
|
||||
| 'finalize_step_done_count'
|
||||
| 'task_done_then_user_reopen_count'
|
||||
@@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ export function createPairedTaskInDatabase(
|
||||
review_requested_at,
|
||||
round_trip_count,
|
||||
owner_failure_count,
|
||||
reviewer_failure_count,
|
||||
owner_step_done_streak,
|
||||
finalize_step_done_count,
|
||||
task_done_then_user_reopen_count,
|
||||
@@ -188,7 +190,7 @@ export function createPairedTaskInDatabase(
|
||||
created_at,
|
||||
updated_at
|
||||
)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
|
||||
`,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.run(
|
||||
@@ -206,6 +208,7 @@ export function createPairedTaskInDatabase(
|
||||
task.review_requested_at,
|
||||
task.round_trip_count,
|
||||
task.owner_failure_count ?? 0,
|
||||
task.reviewer_failure_count ?? 0,
|
||||
task.owner_step_done_streak ?? 0,
|
||||
task.finalize_step_done_count ?? 0,
|
||||
task.task_done_then_user_reopen_count ?? 0,
|
||||
@@ -318,6 +321,10 @@ export function updatePairedTaskInDatabase(
|
||||
fields.push('owner_failure_count = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.owner_failure_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (updates.reviewer_failure_count !== undefined) {
|
||||
fields.push('reviewer_failure_count = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.reviewer_failure_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (updates.owner_step_done_streak !== undefined) {
|
||||
fields.push('owner_step_done_streak = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.owner_step_done_streak);
|
||||
@@ -397,6 +404,10 @@ export function updatePairedTaskIfUnchangedInDatabase(
|
||||
fields.push('owner_failure_count = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.owner_failure_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (updates.reviewer_failure_count !== undefined) {
|
||||
fields.push('reviewer_failure_count = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.reviewer_failure_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (updates.owner_step_done_streak !== undefined) {
|
||||
fields.push('owner_step_done_streak = ?');
|
||||
values.push(updates.owner_step_done_streak);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user