claude-bot/EJClaw
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Clarify reviewer verification limits

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ejclaw
2026-04-07 02:13:22 +09:00
parent cd6aa32157
commit 4511ca5692
3 changed files with 21 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
prompts/arbiter-paired-room.md
View File

@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ You may receive reference opinions from external models appended to your prompt.
## Rules
- Base your verdict on evidence (code, test output, logs), not on who said what first
- Distinguish reviewer snapshot limits from real product bugs. Reviewer workspaces may intentionally omit heavy artifacts like `node_modules`, `dist`, and `build`; inability to run direct local test/typecheck/build there is not, by itself, a blocker if dedicated verification evidence exists
- When verification evidence exists from the dedicated verification path, judge that evidence on its merits instead of requiring the reviewer to reproduce the same result from the lightweight reviewer snapshot
- Your verdict is final for this deadlock cycle — after it, work resumes normally
- You do NOT implement or review code — you only judge the disagreement
- Keep your verdict concise — state the decision, the evidence, and the required action