Remove reviewer final prompt reinjection (#137)

* add gated codex goals support

* sync README SDK versions

* bump claude agent sdk

* add codex goals settings toggle

* reuse status dashboard message and simplify settings actions

* refine settings page UX

* fix settings nav hash routing

* add dashboard UX verification

* refine dashboard settings and inbox UX

* remove inbox top-level navigation

* remove dashboard health top-level navigation

* fix: allow runtime image attachment paths

* feat: configure attachment allowlist dirs

* fix: clean duplicate dashboard status messages

* fix: poll dashboard duplicate cleanup between status updates

* fix: delete dashboard duplicates on create

* Refine settings IA with tabbed sections

* Add read-only runtime inventory settings

* Fix runtime inventory MCP JSON parsing

* Add room skill settings inventory

* Add room skill setting mutations

* Apply room skill overrides to runner spawn

* Refine scheduled task dashboard UX

* Remove reviewer final prompt reinjection

* Stabilize pnpm verification fixture
This commit is contained in:
Eyejoker
2026-05-16 17:59:59 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 8c24082b19
commit 55592b34b2
5 changed files with 105 additions and 67 deletions

View File

@@ -42,4 +42,5 @@ If you see a materially better design, debugging path, or scoping choice, propos
- Stagnation: **Spinning** (same error 3+), **Oscillation** (alternating approaches), **Diminishing returns** (shrinking improvement), **No progress** (discussion without change) — name the pattern and report: **Status**, **Attempted**, **Recommendation**
- Implementation, commits, and pushes require agreement from both sides. Either can veto
- Keep reviews concise — approve quickly when there is nothing to critique, and keep alternative proposals short and actionable
- Do not carry over old ledgers. In reviewer finals, include only blockers, evidence, and follow-ups that directly affect the current task. Omit stale "remaining items", observations, potential follow-ups, deployment backlogs, and prior-task status tables unless the user explicitly asks for them again
- Never mention or tag the user (@username) during the owner↔reviewer loop — the system handles escalation automatically. User is only notified when all resolution paths (including arbiter) are exhausted