fix: resume owner after failed reviewer feedback (#208)

src/paired-completion-signals.test.ts

@@ -135,6 +135,16 @@ describe('paired completion signals', () => {
         visibleVerdict: 'done',
       }),
     ).toEqual({ kind: 'request_owner_finalize' });
+    expect(
+      resolveReviewerFailureSignal({
+        visibleVerdict: 'step_done',
+      }),
+    ).toEqual({ kind: 'request_owner_changes' });
+    expect(
+      resolveReviewerFailureSignal({
+        visibleVerdict: 'done_with_concerns',
+      }),
+    ).toEqual({ kind: 'request_owner_changes' });
     expect(
       resolveReviewerFailureSignal({
         visibleVerdict: 'needs_context',

src/paired-completion-signals.ts

@@ -98,13 +98,15 @@ export function resolveReviewerFailureSignal(args: {
     case 'task_done':
     case 'done':
       return { kind: 'request_owner_finalize' };
+    case 'step_done':
+    case 'done_with_concerns':
+      return { kind: 'request_owner_changes' };
     case 'blocked':
     case 'needs_context':
       return {
         kind: 'complete',
         completionReason: 'escalated',
       };
-    case 'done_with_concerns':
     case 'continue':
     default:
       return { kind: 'preserve_review_ready' };

src/paired-execution-context-reviewer.ts

@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ export function handleFailedReviewerExecution(args: {
     });
     if (
       signal.kind === 'request_owner_finalize' ||
-      signal.kind === 'complete'
+      signal.kind === 'complete' ||
+      signal.kind === 'request_owner_changes'
     ) {
       const ownerWs =
         signal.kind === 'request_owner_finalize'
@@ -68,7 +69,9 @@ export function handleFailedReviewerExecution(args: {
         nextStatus:
           signal.kind === 'request_owner_finalize'
             ? 'merge_ready'
-            : 'completed',
+            : signal.kind === 'request_owner_changes'
+              ? 'active'
+              : 'completed',
         expectedUpdatedAt: task.updated_at,
         updatedAt: now,
         patch: {

src/paired-execution-context.test.ts

@@ -1445,3 +1445,36 @@ describe('paired execution context', () => {
     });
   });
 });
+
+describe('paired execution context reviewer failures', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.resetAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  it('moves failed reviewer STEP_DONE output back to active for owner follow-up', () => {
+    const task = buildPairedTask({
+      status: 'in_review',
+      updated_at: '2026-03-28T00:05:00.000Z',
+    });
+    vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(task);
+
+    completePairedExecutionContext({
+      taskId: task.id,
+      role: 'reviewer',
+      status: 'failed',
+      runId: 'run-failed-reviewer-step-done',
+      summary: 'STEP_DONE\n오너 수정이 더 필요합니다.',
+    });
+
+    expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      task.id,
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        status: 'active',
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(db.releasePairedTaskExecutionLease).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      taskId: task.id,
+      runId: 'run-failed-reviewer-step-done',
+    });
+  });
+});