claude-bot/EJClaw
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove reviewer final prompt reinjection

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ejclaw
2026-05-16 18:51:02 +09:00
parent d6de6e13a5
commit 7574953158
5 changed files with 91 additions and 40 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
src/message-runtime.test.ts
View File

@@ -1646,12 +1646,11 @@ describe('createMessageRuntime', () => {
);
});
it('includes the latest reviewer summary in merge_ready finalize prompts and truncates it', async () => {
it('uses a compact finalize prompt without reinjecting reviewer output', async () => {
const chatJid = 'group@test';
const group = makeGroup('codex');
const channel = makeChannel(chatJid);
const longReviewerOutput = `검토 요약 ${'a'.repeat(2105)} 끝`;
const truncatedReviewerOutput = longReviewerOutput.slice(0, 2000);
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.hasReviewerLease).mockReturnValue(true);
vi.mocked(db.getLatestOpenPairedTaskForChat).mockReturnValue({
@@ -1701,11 +1700,12 @@ describe('createMessageRuntime', () => {
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
async (_group, input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
expect(input.prompt).toBe(
`The reviewer approved the current task scope (TASK_DONE / legacy DONE). Finalize and report the result.
If you intend to close this paired turn now, your first line must be TASK_DONE.
If the original request still has remaining work and the owner flow should continue, your first line may be STEP_DONE.
If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead of finishing.\n\nReviewer's final assessment:\n${truncatedReviewerOutput}`,
'The reviewer approved the current task scope (TASK_DONE / legacy DONE). Finalize and report the result.\n' +
'If you intend to close this paired turn now, your first line must be TASK_DONE.\n' +
'If the original request still has remaining work and the owner flow should continue, your first line may be STEP_DONE.\n' +
'If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead of finishing.',
);
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain("Reviewer's final assessment:");
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain(longReviewerOutput);
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain('이전 reviewer 요약');
await onOutput?.({
@@ -1811,8 +1811,9 @@ If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
async (_group, input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
expect(input.prompt).toBe(
"The reviewer approved the current task scope (TASK_DONE / legacy DONE). Finalize and report the result.\nIf you intend to close this paired turn now, your first line must be TASK_DONE.\nIf the original request still has remaining work and the owner flow should continue, your first line may be STEP_DONE.\nIf your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead of finishing.\n\nReviewer's final assessment:\n리뷰 승인 요약",
'The reviewer approved the current task scope (TASK_DONE / legacy DONE). Finalize and report the result.\nIf you intend to close this paired turn now, your first line must be TASK_DONE.\nIf the original request still has remaining work and the owner flow should continue, your first line may be STEP_DONE.\nIf your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead of finishing.',
);
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain('리뷰 승인 요약');
expect(input.prompt).not.toContain('DONE\n승인합니다.');
await onOutput?.({
status: 'success',
@@ -1993,7 +1994,7 @@ If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead
});
});
it('includes previous task owner and reviewer finals in a new reviewer prompt when the current task has no outputs', () => {
it('includes previous task owner final but omits reviewer final in a new reviewer prompt when the current task has no outputs', () => {
const chatJid = 'group@test';
const group = makeGroup('claude-code');
const currentTask = {
@@ -2070,8 +2071,8 @@ If your first line is DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, the system will reopen review instead
);
expect(pending?.prompt).toContain('Previous task owner final:');
expect(pending?.prompt).toContain('이전 owner 답변');
expect(pending?.prompt).toContain('Previous task reviewer final:');
expect(pending?.prompt).toContain('이전 reviewer 피드백');
expect(pending?.prompt).not.toContain('Previous task reviewer final:');
expect(pending?.prompt).not.toContain('이전 reviewer 피드백');
});
it('does not build an owner follow-up pending turn from owner STEP_DONE on an active task', () => {