Require reviewer status first line
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ If you see a materially better design, debugging path, or scoping choice, propos
|
|||||||
## Completion status
|
## Completion status
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Start your first line** with one of these six statuses. This is required.
|
**Start your first line** with one of these six statuses. This is required.
|
||||||
|
If the first visible line is not one of these statuses, the output is invalid; do not put explanations, greetings, or summaries before the status.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **STEP_DONE** — The current step is acceptable, but the original requested task still has remaining work. Send the task back to the owner without escalating to the arbiter
|
- **STEP_DONE** — The current step is acceptable, but the original requested task still has remaining work. Send the task back to the owner without escalating to the arbiter
|
||||||
- **TASK_DONE** — Approved. The owner's work satisfies the full requested task. Include the evidence
|
- **TASK_DONE** — Approved. The owner's work satisfies the full requested task. Include the evidence
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ describe('platform-prompts', () => {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
const codexPairedPrompt = readPairedRoomPrompt('codex', repoRoot);
|
const codexPairedPrompt = readPairedRoomPrompt('codex', repoRoot);
|
||||||
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain('reviewer');
|
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain('reviewer');
|
||||||
|
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain('the output is invalid');
|
||||||
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain('EJCLAW_WORK_DIR');
|
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain('EJCLAW_WORK_DIR');
|
||||||
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain(
|
expect(codexPairedPrompt).toContain(
|
||||||
'canonical verification root for this turn',
|
'canonical verification root for this turn',
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user