Files
EJClaw/src/paired-execution-context-routing.test.ts
Codex 4d3ab20378 fix(paired): stop silent halt on reviewer PROCEED + reviewer-unavailable
Two causes of the paired room "keeps stopping" symptom:
- Reviewer approvals worded as "PROCEED" were parsed as 'continue'
  (a change request), causing an owner TASK_DONE <-> reviewer PROCEED
  ping-pong until the deadlock cap. parseReviewerVerdict() now treats a
  leading PROCEED as approval so the turn finalizes after one round.
- When the Codex reviewer was unavailable, the owner's answer was held
  for review and the user saw nothing. Now the held owner answer is
  emitted with a "review skipped" notice on reviewer_codex_unavailable.

Verified: tsc --noEmit clean; 27 related vitest tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 19:30:22 +09:00

348 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript

import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
vi.mock('./db.js', () => {
const updatePairedTask = vi.fn();
return {
getPairedTaskById: vi.fn(),
getPairedWorkspace: vi.fn(),
updatePairedTask,
updatePairedTaskIfUnchanged: vi.fn((id, _expectedUpdatedAt, updates) => {
updatePairedTask(id, updates);
return true;
}),
releasePairedTaskExecutionLease: vi.fn(),
};
});
vi.mock('./paired-workspace-manager.js', () => ({
isOwnerWorkspaceRepairNeededError: vi.fn(() => false),
markPairedTaskReviewReady: vi.fn(),
prepareReviewerWorkspaceForExecution: vi.fn(),
provisionOwnerWorkspaceForPairedTask: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock('./logger.js', () => ({
logger: {
debug: vi.fn(),
info: vi.fn(),
warn: vi.fn(),
error: vi.fn(),
},
}));
import * as config from './config.js';
import * as db from './db.js';
import { completePairedExecutionContext } from './paired-execution-context.js';
import type { PairedTask } from './types.js';
function buildPairedTask(overrides: Partial<PairedTask> = {}): PairedTask {
return {
id: 'task-1',
chat_jid: 'dc:test',
group_folder: 'ejclaw',
owner_service_id: config.CODEX_MAIN_SERVICE_ID,
reviewer_service_id: config.REVIEWER_SERVICE_ID_FOR_TYPE,
title: null,
source_ref: 'HEAD',
plan_notes: null,
review_requested_at: null,
round_trip_count: 0,
owner_failure_count: 0,
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
finalize_step_done_count: 0,
task_done_then_user_reopen_count: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
status: 'active',
arbiter_verdict: null,
arbiter_requested_at: null,
completion_reason: null,
created_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:00.000Z',
updated_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:00.000Z',
...overrides,
};
}
describe('paired execution routing loop guards', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
vi.mocked(db.getPairedWorkspace).mockReturnValue(undefined);
});
it('clears stale owner loop state when reviewer approves normally', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_review',
source_ref: 'approved-ref',
owner_failure_count: 1,
owner_step_done_streak: 3,
finalize_step_done_count: 1,
empty_step_done_streak: 2,
arbiter_verdict: 'proceed',
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:01.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'reviewer',
status: 'succeeded',
summary: 'TASK_DONE\n승인',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'merge_ready',
source_ref: 'approved-ref',
owner_failure_count: 0,
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
finalize_step_done_count: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
arbiter_verdict: null,
arbiter_requested_at: null,
}),
);
});
it('treats a reviewer PROCEED as approval and routes to owner finalize', () => {
// Regression: Codex reviewers approve with an arbiter-style "PROCEED" line.
// It used to parse as 'continue' (a change request), so the reviewer's
// approval bounced the task back to active and owner↔reviewer ping-ponged
// (owner TASK_DONE ↔ reviewer PROCEED) until the deadlock cap. A PROCEED
// approval must move the task to merge_ready so the owner can finalize.
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_review',
source_ref: 'approved-ref',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'reviewer',
status: 'succeeded',
summary: 'PROCEED\n위치와 첨부는 맞습니다.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'merge_ready',
}),
);
});
it('clears stale owner loop state when reviewer approval is recovered from a failed run', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_review',
source_ref: 'approved-ref',
owner_step_done_streak: 2,
empty_step_done_streak: 2,
arbiter_verdict: 'proceed',
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:01.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'reviewer',
status: 'failed',
summary: 'DONE\n승인',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'merge_ready',
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
arbiter_verdict: null,
arbiter_requested_at: null,
}),
);
});
it('routes arbiter PROCEED back to reviewer instead of owner ping-pong', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_arbitration',
round_trip_count: config.ARBITER_DEADLOCK_THRESHOLD,
owner_step_done_streak: 3,
finalize_step_done_count: 1,
empty_step_done_streak: 4,
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:01.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'arbiter',
status: 'succeeded',
summary: 'PROCEED\nReviewer should approve.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'review_ready',
round_trip_count: 0,
owner_failure_count: 0,
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
finalize_step_done_count: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
arbiter_verdict: 'proceed',
arbiter_requested_at: null,
}),
);
});
it('escalates unknown arbiter verdicts instead of treating them as approval', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_arbitration',
round_trip_count: config.ARBITER_DEADLOCK_THRESHOLD,
owner_step_done_streak: 3,
empty_step_done_streak: 4,
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:01.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'arbiter',
status: 'succeeded',
summary: 'No formal verdict, but this should not re-run owner.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'completed',
arbiter_verdict: 'unknown',
completion_reason: 'arbiter_escalated',
}),
);
});
it('returns arbiter terminal Codex account failures to owner without re-arming arbiter', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_arbitration',
owner_failure_count: 1,
owner_step_done_streak: 3,
finalize_step_done_count: 1,
empty_step_done_streak: 2,
arbiter_verdict: 'revise',
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:04.000Z',
updated_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:05.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'arbiter',
status: 'failed',
summary:
'auth-expired: All Codex rotation accounts unavailable; re-auth required before launching Codex\nExecution completed without a visible terminal verdict.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'active',
owner_failure_count: 2,
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
finalize_step_done_count: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
arbiter_verdict: null,
arbiter_requested_at: null,
}),
);
});
it('completes reviewer task after terminal Codex account failure instead of preserving review_ready loop', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_review',
updated_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:05.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'reviewer',
status: 'failed',
summary:
'auth-expired: All Codex rotation accounts unavailable; re-auth required before launching Codex\nExecution completed without a visible terminal verdict.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'completed',
arbiter_verdict: 'escalate',
arbiter_requested_at: null,
completion_reason: 'reviewer_codex_unavailable',
}),
);
});
it('preserves owner task after terminal Codex account failure instead of completing silently', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'active',
updated_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:05.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'owner',
status: 'failed',
summary:
'auth-expired: All Codex rotation accounts unavailable; re-auth required before launching Codex\nExecution completed without a visible terminal verdict.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
owner_failure_count: 1,
arbiter_verdict: null,
arbiter_requested_at: null,
completion_reason: null,
}),
);
});
it('keeps arbiter REVISE on owner flow while clearing stale loop counters', () => {
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue(
buildPairedTask({
status: 'in_arbitration',
round_trip_count: config.ARBITER_DEADLOCK_THRESHOLD,
owner_step_done_streak: 3,
empty_step_done_streak: 4,
arbiter_requested_at: '2026-03-28T00:00:01.000Z',
}),
);
completePairedExecutionContext({
taskId: 'task-1',
role: 'arbiter',
status: 'succeeded',
summary: 'REVISE\nOwner must fix this.',
});
expect(db.updatePairedTask).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'task-1',
expect.objectContaining({
status: 'active',
owner_step_done_streak: 0,
empty_step_done_streak: 0,
arbiter_verdict: 'revise',
arbiter_requested_at: null,
}),
);
});
});