Avoid duplicate paired follow-up scheduling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -129,4 +129,26 @@ describe('message-agent-executor-rules', () => {
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe('pending');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not request a generic follow-up after successful owner output moved the task to review_ready', () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
resolvePairedFollowUpQueueAction({
|
||||
completedRole: 'owner',
|
||||
executionStatus: 'succeeded',
|
||||
sawOutput: true,
|
||||
taskStatus: 'review_ready',
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe('none');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not request a generic follow-up after successful reviewer output moved the task back to active', () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
resolvePairedFollowUpQueueAction({
|
||||
completedRole: 'reviewer',
|
||||
executionStatus: 'succeeded',
|
||||
sawOutput: true,
|
||||
taskStatus: 'active',
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe('none');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,9 +127,7 @@ export function resolvePairedFollowUpQueueAction(args: {
|
||||
return args.completedRole === 'reviewer' &&
|
||||
args.taskStatus === 'merge_ready'
|
||||
? 'skip-inline-finalize'
|
||||
: args.taskStatus !== 'completed'
|
||||
? 'generic'
|
||||
: 'none';
|
||||
: 'none';
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const shouldRequeuePendingPairedTurn =
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1238,6 +1238,171 @@ describe('runAgentForGroup room memory', () => {
|
||||
expect(deps.queue.enqueueMessageCheck).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not enqueue a generic follow-up when owner output already moved the task to review_ready', async () => {
|
||||
const group = { ...makeGroup(), folder: 'test-group' };
|
||||
const deps = makeDeps();
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mocked(
|
||||
pairedExecutionContext.preparePairedExecutionContext,
|
||||
).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
task: {
|
||||
id: 'paired-task-owner-review-ready',
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
group_folder: 'test-group',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'codex-review',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
round_trip_count: 0,
|
||||
review_requested_at: null,
|
||||
status: 'active',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
},
|
||||
workspace: null,
|
||||
envOverrides: {},
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
id: 'paired-task-owner-review-ready',
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
group_folder: 'test-group',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'codex-review',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
round_trip_count: 0,
|
||||
review_requested_at: null,
|
||||
status: 'review_ready',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
|
||||
async (_group, _input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
|
||||
await onOutput?.({
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nowner complete',
|
||||
output: {
|
||||
visibility: 'public',
|
||||
text: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nowner complete',
|
||||
},
|
||||
phase: 'final',
|
||||
});
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nowner complete',
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await runAgentForGroup(deps, {
|
||||
group,
|
||||
prompt: 'please implement',
|
||||
chatJid: 'group@test',
|
||||
runId: 'run-owner-review-ready',
|
||||
onOutput: async () => {},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe('success');
|
||||
expect(deps.queue.enqueueMessageCheck).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not enqueue a generic follow-up when reviewer output already returned the task to active', async () => {
|
||||
const group = { ...makeGroup(), folder: 'test-group' };
|
||||
const deps = makeDeps();
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mocked(serviceRouting.getEffectiveChannelLease).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
owner_agent_type: 'codex',
|
||||
reviewer_agent_type: 'claude-code',
|
||||
arbiter_agent_type: null,
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'codex-main',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
arbiter_service_id: null,
|
||||
activated_at: null,
|
||||
reason: null,
|
||||
explicit: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(
|
||||
pairedExecutionContext.preparePairedExecutionContext,
|
||||
).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
task: {
|
||||
id: 'paired-task-reviewer-active',
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
group_folder: 'test-group',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'codex-main',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
round_trip_count: 1,
|
||||
review_requested_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
status: 'in_review',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
},
|
||||
workspace: null,
|
||||
envOverrides: {},
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(db.getPairedTaskById).mockReturnValue({
|
||||
id: 'paired-task-reviewer-active',
|
||||
chat_jid: 'group@test',
|
||||
group_folder: 'test-group',
|
||||
owner_service_id: 'codex-main',
|
||||
reviewer_service_id: 'claude',
|
||||
title: null,
|
||||
source_ref: 'HEAD',
|
||||
plan_notes: null,
|
||||
round_trip_count: 1,
|
||||
review_requested_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
status: 'active',
|
||||
arbiter_verdict: null,
|
||||
arbiter_requested_at: null,
|
||||
completion_reason: null,
|
||||
created_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
vi.mocked(agentRunner.runAgentProcess).mockImplementation(
|
||||
async (_group, _input, _onProcess, onOutput) => {
|
||||
await onOutput?.({
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nreview complete',
|
||||
output: {
|
||||
visibility: 'public',
|
||||
text: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nreview complete',
|
||||
},
|
||||
phase: 'final',
|
||||
});
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: 'success',
|
||||
result: 'DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\nreview complete',
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await runAgentForGroup(deps, {
|
||||
group,
|
||||
prompt: 'please review',
|
||||
chatJid: 'group@test',
|
||||
runId: 'run-reviewer-active',
|
||||
forcedRole: 'reviewer',
|
||||
onOutput: async () => {},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe('success');
|
||||
expect(deps.queue.enqueueMessageCheck).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('re-enqueues the group when a reviewer fails and the task remains review_ready', async () => {
|
||||
const group = { ...makeGroup(), folder: 'test-group' };
|
||||
const deps = makeDeps();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user